<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ERA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Engineering Research and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-3154</issn><eissn>2993-2742</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Design</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/ERA.12260</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>超低密度泡沫水泥浆固井技术研究与应用</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/ERA/3/5/10.61369/ERA.12260</url><author>初永涛</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-05-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>针对恶性漏失井动态承压堵漏周期长、费用高、防漏效果不理想的难题，利用压力平衡固井防漏、泡沫堵漏贾敏效应，提出了泡沫水泥浆近平衡或欠平衡防漏固井技术，成功避免承压堵漏作业并实现浅表层失返性漏失井的成功堵漏。该技术在现场应用18口井，成功实现漏失井堵漏和固井作业，提高了固井优良率，完全可以代替分级与尾管固井工艺，深层漏失井固井周期平均节约承压堵漏周期7天以上，浅表层漏失井平均节约钻井周期30天以上。对解决深井、高温井固井漏失、浅表层漏失承压堵漏等难题具有重要借鉴意义，具有持续性推广价值。</abstract><keywords>固井,泡沫水泥浆,防漏,堵漏</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 刘彦学. 龙凤山气田易漏地层低密度固井技术[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量,2019,39(14):192-194.[2] 许树谦. 充气泡沫水泥浆固井技术研究[D]. 成都：西南石油大学,1998.[3] 朱礼平. 液氮泡沫水泥固井工艺及施工技术研究[D]. 西南石油大学,2007.[4] 肖京男，刘建，桑来玉，等. 充气泡沫水泥浆固井技术在焦页9 井的应用[J]. 断块油气田，2016，23（6）:835-83.[5]Odden, D. A., Lende, G., Rehman, K., Lilledal, L., Smyth, C., Diesen, M., &amp;hellip;Laget, M.. Use of Foam Cement to Prevent Shallow Water Flow on Three Wells inNorwegian Waters. International Petroleum Technology Conference. doi:10.2523/IPTC-19747-MS.2020.[6]Ahmady, A., Turton, S., Lewis, S., Grant, M., &amp;amp; Murphy, B. ImprovedChanneling and Gas Migration Issues Using Foam Cement: Case History, MontneyFormation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/199614-MS,2020.[7]Guillot, D. J. and E. L. Bastard. Learnings from Foamed Cement Job Simulations [C].Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas, USA, 2012.[8]Torgeir Kj&amp;phi;stvedt. New methodology for laboratory mixing of foam cement tobetter reflect onsite mixing method [D].Norway: University of Stavanger, 2011.[9]GUILLOT D J,Le BASTARD E. Learnings from foamed cement job simulations[R].SPE 23666，2012.[10]DOOPLY M,ELHANCHA A,de BRUIJN G,et al. Application of real-time processcontrol and engineering software simulation in foam cementing[R].SPE 168033，2014.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
