<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Theory and Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-3448</issn><eissn>2995-3456</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Design</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/ETR.2025460050</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>新工科背景下大学生《操作系统》课程学习投入度的多维度评价研究</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/ETR/3/46/10.61369/ETR.2025460050</url><author>谢娜,厉丹,党向盈</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>46</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-11-14</published-time></date></history><abstract>为了探究新工科背景下大学生学习投入度影响因素，本文对徐州工程学院计算机相关专业学生的操作系统课程学习情况进行跟踪。构建包含&amp;ldquo;行为、情感、认知&amp;rdquo;三维度的学习投入度量表及影响因素量表。利用SPSS进行数据分析，结果表明该专业学生的整体学习投入度中等偏上，在该课程中的认知投入相对较高，但行为投入与情感投入存在提升空间。普本学生的学习投入度明显高于专升本和对口单招学生；同时，教师的引导方式、课程实践环节的设计以及学生的自我效能感是影响学习投入度的关键因素。可为后期优化教学设计、实施精准干预提供依据。</abstract><keywords>学习投入度,影响因素,新工科,操作系统,信效度分析</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Schaufeli W B, Mart&amp;iacute;nez I M, et al. Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2002, 33(33): 464-481.[2]George D. Kuh, Jillian Kinzie, John H. Schuh. Student Success in College[J].Teachers College Record,2005,108(8):1583-1585.[3] Fredicks, Jennifer A., Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, and Alison H.Pairs. "School engagement:Potential of the concept,state of the evidence."[J].Review of educational research 74.1(2004):59-109.[4] 汪雅霜. 大学生学习投入度对学习收获影响的实证研究&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;基于多层线性模型的分析结果[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2015(07):76-81.[5] Ｒ eeve，J．＆ M．Tseng．Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities[J]．Contemporary Educational Psychology，2011 ,36(4):257 - 267.[6]Bates R, Khasawneh S. Self-efficacy and college students' perceptions and use of online learning systems[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2007,23(1):175-191.&amp;nbsp;[7] 黄鑫睿.智慧教室环境下小学生课堂学习投入度及影响因素研究[D].华中师范大学,2016.[8]Jang H, Reeve J, Deci L. Engaging students inlearning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autoomy support and structure.[J].Journey of Educational Psychplogy, 2010,102(3):588-600.[9] 张娜 . 国内外学习投入及其学校影响因素研究综述[J].心理研究,2012,5(2):83-92.[10] Gillen-O'Neel C. Sense of Belonging and Student Engagement: A Daily Study of First-and Continung-Generation College Students.[J].Research in Higher Education,2021,62:45-71.[11] 杨成浩.基于SERVQUAL 模型的同步互动混合课堂学生学习体验研究[D].华中师范大学,2018.[12] 张屹,郝琪,陈蓓蕾,等.智慧教室环境下大学生课堂学习投入度及影响因素研究:以"教育技术学研究方法课"为例[J].中国电化教育,2019(1):106-115.[13]Dornyei Z．Researching complex dynamic systems:"Retrodictive qualitative modelling" in the language classroom[J]. Language Teaching，2014(1)&amp;nbsp;</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
