<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Society and Economy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-4959</issn><eissn>2995-4975</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Design</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/SE.2025050027</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>大数据时代循证决策机制优化探析</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SE/3/5/10.61369/SE.2025050027</url><author>陶晓</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-05-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>随着社会问题复杂程度的增加，大数据应用为政府解决棘手问题、制定政策方案提供了新思路、新方法。循证决策的核心是科学证据，而公共政策的制定需建立在科学证据的基础上。大数据对科学证据的获取有重要影响，进而影响公共政策的制定。本文通过分析传统循证决策模式证据质量不高、风险社会遭到质疑、线性范式导致证据割裂的弊端，提出大数据背景下循证决策模式对公共政策制定的优化机制，包含充足的科学证据、完善的科学决策互动机制、连续的决策周期，进而帮助提高公共政策制定的科学性。</abstract><keywords>大数据时代,循证决策,科学证据,优化机制</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 郭巍青.政策制定的方法论:理性主义与反理性主义[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2003(02):39-45+123.&amp;nbsp;[2]Sanderson I .Making sense of &amp;lsquo;what works&amp;rsquo;: Evidence based policy making as instrumental rationality?[J].Public Policy and Administration,2002,17(3):61-75.&amp;nbsp;[3]Davies P .What is evidence‐based education?[J].British Journal of Educational Studies, 1999, 47(2)：108-121.&amp;nbsp;[4] 丁煌.政策制定的科学性与政策执行的有效性[J].南京社会科学,2002,(01):38-44.&amp;nbsp;[5]Cloete F .The Politics of evidence-based policy making, Paul Cairney. Palgrave Macmillan (2016). 131 pp. of text, Hard cover 45 pound sterling, e-book 36 pound sterling[J].&amp;nbsp;Evaluation and Program Planning,2017,60100-102.&amp;nbsp;[6]Giest S .Big data for policymaking: fad or fasttrack?[J].Policy Sciences,2017,50(3):367-382.&amp;nbsp;[7]Sivarajah ,Weerakkody ,Waller , et al.The role of e-participation and open data in evidence-based policy decision making in local government[J].Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,2016,26(1-2):64-79.&amp;nbsp;[8]B&amp;eacute;dard P .Understanding evidence and behavioral responses: Future directions in evidence‐based policy‐making[J].Canadian Public Administration,2017,60(3):443-446.&amp;nbsp;[9]Diana J ,Maree J ,Rhonda G , et al.Engaging clinicians in evidence based policy development: the case of nursing documentation.[J].Contemporary nurse,2010,35(2):254-64.&amp;nbsp;[10]Hunter D .Relationship between evidence and policy: A case of evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence?[J].Public Health,2009,123(9):583-586.&amp;nbsp;[11] 魏景容.大数据时代循证决策研究:一个分析框架[J].中国科技论坛,2020(07):24-32.&amp;nbsp;[12] 刘瑞,马海群.基于循证决策的开放数据政策制定体系构建[J].现代情报,2020,40(08):129-133.&amp;nbsp;[13] 郁俊莉 , 姚清晨 . 从 数据 到 证 据 : 大 数 据 时 代 政 府 循 证 决 策 机 制 构 建 研 究 [J]. 中国行政管理,2020(04):81-87.&amp;nbsp;[14] 赵 晰 , 谢倩雯 . 循 证 决 策 的 实 践 障 碍 与 发 展 经 验 [J]. 华 东 理 工 大 学 学 报 ( 社会科学版),2020,35(06):57-69.&amp;nbsp;[15] 高鹏飞,吴琼.科学与决策的协同：新型政府循证决策模式构建与逻辑延伸[J].领导科学,2021(06):97-100.&amp;nbsp;[16] 吕佳龄,温珂.循证决策的协同模式：面向国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的科学与决策关系建构[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(05):602-610.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
